Cost-effectiveness of intraoperative radiation therapy versus intensity-modulated radiation therapy for the treatment of early breast cancer: a disinvestment analysis.

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant radiotherapy represents a key component in curative-intent treatment for early-stage breast cancer patients. In recent years, two accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) techniques are preferred for this population in our organization: electron-based Intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) and Linac-based External Beam Radiotherapy, particularly Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Recently published long-term follow-up data evaluating these technologies have motivated a health technology reassessment of IORT compared to IMRT. METHODS: We developed a Markov model to simulate health-state transitions from a cohort of women with early-stage breast cancer, after lumpectomy and adjuvant APBI using either IORT or IMRT techniques. The cost-effectiveness from a private health provider perspective was assessed from a disinvestment point of view, using life-years (LYs) and recurrence-free life-years (RFLYs) as measure of benefits, along with their respective quality adjustments. Expected costs and benefits, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) were reported. Finally, a sensitivity and scenario analyses were performed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness using lower IORT local recurrence and metastasis rates in IORT patients, and if equipment maintenance costs are removed. RESULTS: IORT technology was dominated by IMRT in all cases (i.e., fewer benefits with greater costs). Despite small differences were found regarding benefits, especially for LYs, costs were considerably higher for IORT. For sensitivity analyses with lower recurrence and metastasis rates for IORT, and scenario analyses without equipment maintenance costs, IORT was still dominated by IMRT. CONCLUSIONS: For this cohort of patients, IMRT was, at least, non-inferior to IORT in terms of expected benefits, with considerably lower costs. As a result, IORT disinvestment should be considered, favoring the use of IMRT in these patients.

Evaluation of different body temperature measurement methods for patients in the intraoperative period.

OBJECTIVES: this study aimed at estimating and comparing the reliability of temperature measurements obtained using a peripheral infrared temporal thermometer, a central cutaneous thermometer ("Zero-Heat-Flux Cutaneous thermometer") and an esophageal or nasopharyngeal thermometer among elective surgical patients in the intraoperative period. METHOD: a longitudinal study with repeated measures carried out by convenience sampling of 99 patients, aged at least 18 years old, undergoing elective abdominal cancer surgeries, with anesthesia lasting at least one hour, with each patient having their temperature measured by all three methods. RESULTS: the intraclass correlation coefficient showed a low correlation between the measurements using the peripheral temporal thermometer and the central cutaneous (0.0324) and esophageal/nasopharyngeal (-0.138) thermometers. There was a high correlation (0.744) between the central thermometers evaluated. CONCLUSION: the data from the current study do not recommend using infrared temporal thermometers as a strategy for measuring the body temperature of patients undergoing anesthetic-surgical procedures. Central cutaneous thermometers and esophageal/nasopharyngeal thermometers are equivalent for detecting intraoperative hypothermia.

Influence of Pre- and Intraoperative Local Anaesthetic in Strabismus Surgery under General Anaesthesia in Adults.

BACKGROUND: As studies have shown a reduction in the occurrence of the oculocardiac reflex with the addition of local anaesthesia, we changed our care regime accordingly a few years ago. To promote and establish better patient care, we retrospectively analysed the files of our patients who underwent strabismus surgery from 2013 to 2021 in order to compare strabismus surgery under general anaesthesia with and without local anaesthetics in a routine clinical setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from 238 adult patients who had undergone strabismus surgery could be extracted from the files: G1: n = 102, only general anaesthesia; G2: n = 136, preoperative application of tetracaine eye drops and intraoperative subtenon lidocaine/levobupivacaine in addition to general anaesthesia. We compared the two groups in regard to the frequency of oculocardiac reflex, the amount of atropine needed to treat, as well as the amount of antiemetic and analgesic medication given, and time spent in the recovery room. RESULTS: Mean age of G1 was 50 years and 52 years in G2. There was no significant difference between the kind of surgeries (recessions/resections), the number of patients who had undergone a reoperation, or the duration of the operations. Adding local anaesthetics resulted in significantly less occurrence of oculocardiac reflex (p = 0.009), a reduction in the need for atropine, analgesic, or antiemetic medication, as well as reduced time in the recovery room. CONCLUSION: As this increases patient safety and comfort and is cost-effective (less time in the recovery room), we recommend adding perioperative local anaesthesia to strabismus surgery performed under general anaesthesia.

The Effect of Preoperative Education Regarding Intraoperative Care on a Patient's Level of Fear of Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Study.

This randomized controlled study aimed to investigate the effect that preoperative education provided by the perioperative nurse about the OR environment and intraoperative care has on surgical fear in patients who come to the OR for surgical intervention. The study involved 92 patients undergoing elective abdominal surgery who were randomly assigned to the intervention or routine care group. Preoperatively, patients in the intervention group received education via a form that described the OR environment, the surgical process, and intraoperative care. The patients' surgical fear levels were assessed in the patients' rooms, in the clinic before education, and on arrival to the OR after education. The results showed that preoperative education about the OR environment and intraoperative processes significantly reduced patients' surgical fears.

Short-term outcomes after selective shunt during carotid endarterectomy: A propensity score matching analysis / Resultados a corto plazo después de shunting selectivo durante la endarterectomía carotídea con anestesia regional: un análisis de propensity score-matching

Introduction and objectives: Carotid cross-clamping during carotid endarterectomy might lead to intraoperative neurologic deficits, increasing stroke/death risk. If deficits are detected, carotid shunting has been recommended to reduce the risk of stroke. However, shunting may sustain a specific chance of embolic events and subsequently incurring harm. Current evidence is still questionable regarding its clear benefit. The aim is to determine whether a policy of selective shunt impacts the complication rate following an endarterectomy. Material and methods: From January 2013 to May 2021, all patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy under regional anesthesia with intraoperative neurologic alteration were retrieved. Patients submitted to selective shunt were compared to a non-shunt group. A 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was performed. Differences between the groups and clinical outcomes were calculated, resorting to univariate analysis. Results: Ninety-eight patients were selected, from which 23 were operated on using a shunt. After PSM, 22 non-shunt patients were compared to 22 matched shunted patients. Concerning demographics and comorbidities, both groups were comparable to pre and post-PSM, except for chronic heart failure, which was more prevalent in shunted patients (26.1%, P=0.036) in pre-PSM analysis. Regarding 30-day stroke and score Clavien–Dindo≥2, no significant association was found (P=0.730, P=0.635 and P=0.942, P=0.472, correspondingly, for pre and post-PSM). Conclusions: In this cohort, resorting to shunting did not demonstrate an advantage regarding 30-day stroke or a Clavien–Dindo≥2 rates. Nevertheless, additional more extensive studies are mandatory to achieve precise results concerning the accurate utility of carotid shunting in this subset of patients under regional anesthesia.(AU)

Introducción y objetivos: El pinzamiento carotídeo durante la endarterectomía carotídea podría provocar déficits neurológicos intraoperatorios, lo que aumenta el riesgo de accidente cerebrovascular/muerte. Si se detectan déficits, se ha recomendado la derivación carotídea para reducir el riesgo de accidente cerebrovascular. Sin embargo, la derivación puede sostener una posibilidad específica de eventos embólicos y, posteriormente, provocar daños. La evidencia actual aún es cuestionable con respecto a su claro beneficio. El objetivo es determinar si una política de derivación selectiva afecta la tasa de complicaciones después de una endarterectomía. Material y métodos: Desde enero de 2013 hasta mayo de 2021 se recuperaron todos los pacientes sometidos a endarterectomía carotídea bajo anestesia regional con alteración neurológica intraoperatoria. Los pacientes sometidos a derivación selectiva se compararon con un grupo sin derivación. Se realizó una coincidencia de puntuación de propensión (PSM) 1:1. Se calcularon las diferencias entre los grupos y los resultados clínicos recurriendo al análisis univariado. Resultados: Se seleccionaron 98 pacientes, de los cuales 23 fueron intervenidos mediante derivación. Después de la PSM se compararon 22 pacientes sin derivación con 22 pacientes emparejados con derivación. Con respecto a la demografía y las comorbilidades, ambos grupos fueron comparables a los de antes y después de la PSM, excepto por la insuficiencia cardíaca crónica, que fue más prevalente en los pacientes con derivación (26,1%, p=0,036) en el análisis previo a la PSM. En cuanto al accidente cerebrovascular a los 30 días y la puntuación de Clavien-Dindo≥2, no se encontró asociación significativa (p=0,730, p=0,635 y p=0,942, p=0,472, correspondientemente, para pre y post-PSM). Conclusiones: En esta cohorte recurrir a la derivación no demostró una ventaja con respecto a las tasas de ictus a los 30 días o Clavien-Dindo≥2...(AU)

Intraoperative radiation therapy for pediatric sarcomas and other solid tumors.

PURPOSE: To evaluate local failure (LF) and toxicity after intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) in pediatric solid tumors (ST). METHODS: A single-institution retrospective study of 96 pediatric patients (108 applications) with ST treated from 1995 to 2022 with IORT. LF was calculated via cumulative incidence function and overall survival (OS) by Kaplan-Meier method, both from the day of surgery. RESULTS: Median age at time of IORT was 8 years (range: 0.8-20.9 years). Median follow-up for all patients and surviving patients was 16 months and 3 years, respectively. The most common histologies included rhabdomyosarcoma (n = 42), Ewing sarcoma (n = 10), and Wilms tumor (n = 9). Most (95%) received chemotherapy, 37% had prior external beam radiation therapy to the site of IORT, and 46% had a prior surgery for tumor resection. About half (54%) were treated with upfront IORT to the primary tumor due to difficult circumstances such as very young age or challenging anatomy. The median IORT dose was 12 Gy (range: 4-18 Gy), and median area treated was 24 cm2 (range: 2-198 cm2). The cumulative incidence of LF was 17% at 2 years and 23% at 5 years. Toxicity from IORT was reasonable, with postoperative complications likely related to IORT seen in 15 (16%) patients. CONCLUSION: Our study represents the largest and most recent analysis of efficacy and safety of IORT in pediatric patients with ST. Less than one quarter of all patients failed locally with acceptable toxicities. Overall, IORT is an effective and safe technique to achieve local control in patients with challenging circumstances.

Intraoperative lung protection: strategies and their impact on outcomes.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The present review summarizes the current knowledge and the barriers encountered when implementing tailoring lung-protective ventilation strategies to individual patients based on advanced monitoring systems. RECENT FINDINGS: Lung-protective ventilation has become a pivotal component of perioperative care, aiming to enhance patient outcomes and reduce the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs). High-quality research has established the benefits of strategies such as low tidal volume ventilation and low driving pressures. Debate is still ongoing on the most suitable levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and the role of recruitment maneuvers. Adapting PEEP according to patient-specific factors offers potential benefits in maintaining ventilation distribution uniformity, especially in challenging scenarios like pneumoperitoneum and steep Trendelenburg positions. Advanced monitoring systems, which continuously assess patient responses and enable the fine-tuning of ventilation parameters, offer real-time data analytics to predict and prevent impending lung complications. However, their impact on postoperative outcomes, particularly PPCs, is an ongoing area of research. SUMMARY: Refining protective lung ventilation is crucial to provide patients with the best possible care during surgery, reduce the incidence of PPCs, and improve their overall surgical journey.

Postoperative Complications Following Lumpectomy With Intraoperative X-Ray Radiation Therapy: A Retrospective Comparative Study.

BACKGROUND: Lumpectomy with intraoperative radiation (IORT) is a relatively new modality for the treatment of early breast cancer. IORT delivers targeted radiation to the tumor bed and obviates the need for external beam radiation (EBRT) in 85% of the cases. IORT is being used increasingly around the world, however information regarding early and late postoperative complications associated with the procedure is limited. AIM: To describe and compare complication rates after lumpectomy and IORT with those seen after lumpectomy and EBRT or lumpectomy alone. METHODS: Clinical, demographic, and histopathological data were collected from electronic medical records and a retrospectively maintained database. Postoperative complications were compared for patients undergoing lumpectomy with IORT, lumpectomy with EBRT, and lumpectomy alone over the same period. RESULTS: A total of 445 patients were included in the study: 113 underwent lumpectomy with IORT, 253 had lumpectomy followed by EBRT, and 79 had Lumpectomy alone. Postoperative seroma was documented in 74 patients (65%) after IORT,87 (34%) after EBRT, and 9 (11%) after lumpectomy alone (P = .000). Surgical site infection requiring antibiotic treatment was diagnosed in 26 patients (23%) after IORT, 38 (15%) after EBRT, and 5 (6%) after lumpectomy alone (P = .013). Postoperative erythema was documented in 39 patients (34%) after IORT, 40 (16%) after EBRT, and 5 (6%) after lumpectomy alone (P = .000). Postoperative minor complications such as scar and breast deformity, edema, Mondor's syndrome, and chronic tenderness, were documented in 62 patients (55%) after IORT, 119 (47%) after EBRT, and 13 (17%) after lumpectomy alone (P = .000). The average follow-up was 14 months. CONCLUSIONS: IORT is associated with an increased rate of postoperative complications compared to EBRT or lumpectomy alone. Most complications are minor and transient. We hypothesize that the increased occurrence of complications may also be attributed to overreporting, which is associated with the introduction of a new technology. Educating physicians and patients about potential complications and their course may help establish expectations and improve the management of postoperative complications.

Indocyanine green fluorescence angiography could reduce the risk of anastomotic leakage in rectal cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

AIM: Several papers have shown that use of indocyanine green (ICG) decreases incidence of anastomotic leakage (AL) during colonic surgery, but no clear evidence has been found for rectal cancer surgery. Therefore, with this systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) we aimed to assess if ICG could also reduce risk of AL in rectal cancer surgery. METHOD: PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL and Cochrane databases were searched for RCTs assessing the effect of intraoperative ICG on the incidence of AL of the colorectal anastomosis. Pooled relative risk (RR) and pooled risk difference (RD) were obtained using models with random effects. Risk of bias was evaluated with the Rob2 tool and the quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADE Pro tool. RESULTS: Four RCTs were included for analysis, with a total of 1510 patients (743 controls and 767 ICG patients). The rate of AL was 9% in the ICG group (69/767) and 13.9% (103/743) in the control group (p = 0.003, RR -0.5, 95% CI -0.827 to -0.172, heterogeneity test 0%, p = 0.460). The RD in terms of incidence of AL was significantly decreased by 4.51% (p = 0.031, 95% CI -0.086 to -0.004, heterogeneity test 28%, p = 0.182) when using ICG. CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis suggested that use of ICG during rectal cancer surgery could reduce the rate of AL.

From Causatum to Erratum, all in a name.

BACKGROUND: This study highlights how a trivial mistake in collecting timed blood samples of parathyroid hormone (PTH) during parathyroidectomy (PTX) can potentially become a serious error affecting surgical closure. METHODS: For the measurement of serum PTH, the intact PTH (iPTH) test was used to obtain baseline, preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative samples of PTH, to guide the surgical team regarding adequacy of PTX. RESULTS: Due to the lack of proper guidelines, all types of samples for PTH are labeled as iPTH by the Laboratory Information Services (LIS) software. Due to a human error in marking the PTH vacutainers generated for different time point samples by LIS, samples were swapped. The values in the lab revealed a spurious rise in PTH post-PTX. The laboratory physician carefully observed the tubes and identified the reason for this mistake. The timely action therefore led to surgical closure, otherwise it could have led to unwarranted extended PTX. CONCLUSIONS: In cases where timed samples are mandatory, having a common code for all requisitions can invariably lead to pre-analytical error, therefore proper discriminative measures need to be introduced to avoid these mistakes.

Intraoperative Radiation Therapy for Early-Stage Breast Cancer: Updated Outcomes from a Single-Institution Experience.

BACKGROUND: Increasingly, data have supported the use of partial-breast irradiation (PBI) for low-risk patients after breast-conserving surgery, with techniques allowing for completion of treatment in 1-3 weeks. Intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) is an alternative to PBI. Our institution had used low-energy photon IORT (TARGIT) for more than a decade. The initial results demonstrated a 2% local recurrence rate with a short follow-up period of 2 years. This report presents updated outcomes during with 5-year follow-up. METHODS: A review of an institutional review board (IRB)-approved institutional registry was performed. The review identified 215 patients with early-stage breast cancer (stages 0-IIA) who received IORT. At the time of surgery, IORT was delivered with 20 Gy in a single fraction, with 5.1% (n = 11) of patients receiving additional whole-breast irradiation (WBI). RESULTS: The mean age at diagnosis was 71 years (range, 49-98 years), and the median follow-up was 5.7 years (interquartile range [IQR], 4.2-7.0 years). Of the 215 patients, 2.8% (n = 6) had ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), 90.7% (n = 195) had T1 disease, and 6.5% (n = 14) had T2 disease. Endocrine therapy was prescribed for 79% and chemotherapy for 1.4% of the patients. The 5-year rates were 5.3% for local recurrence, 6.4% for locoregional recurrence, and 2.7% for distant metastases. At 5 years, 93% of the patients were alive. CONCLUSIONS: The 5-year outcomes with TARGIT IORT demonstrated high rates of local recurrence, exceeding those seen with alternative modern approaches. The local recurrence outcomes with IORT are more consistent with studies omitting radiation following breast-conserving surgery, using endocrine therapy alone. Consistent with current guidelines and previous data, TARGIT IORT should not be used as monotherapy outside prospective clinical trials.

Five Fraction Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation Versus Intraoperative Radiation Therapy for Early-Stage Breast Cancer.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S): Accelerated partial breast irradiation (PBI) delivered in 5 fractions with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) has been shown to have comparable clinical outcomes to whole breast irradiation with reduced toxicity profiles. In contrast, intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) offers patients the potential to complete adjuvant radiation therapy in a single treatment. While early data were promising, concerns exist regarding long-term rates of local recurrence after IORT. We present a comparison of 5 fraction PBI versus IORT. MATERIALS/METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 473 patients with early-stage breast cancer treated at a single institution from 2011 to 2021 with 258 receiving PBI and 215 receiving IORT. PBI patients received 30 Gy in 5 fractions delivered with IMRT. IORT patients received 20 Gy in 1 fraction prescribed to the applicator surface at surgery using the low-energy TARGIT technique. RESULTS: Mean age was 71 years old (IQR:67-74) for IORT patients and 67 years old (IQR:62-72) for PBI patients. Median follow up was 5.7 years (IQR:4.2-7.0) for IORT patients and 2.4 years (IQR:1.8-3.3) for PBI patients (P < .001). Recurrence at any time (locoregional and distant) was seen in 7.9% (n = 17) of patients receiving IORT as compared to 0.8% (n = 2) of patients receiving PBI. IORT was associated with reduced rates of locoregional relapse free survival at 5 years (93.6% vs. 99.4%, P = .05) with no difference in overall survival(92.8% vs. 95.1%, P = .99). CONCLUSION: Low-energy TARGIT IORT was associated with higher rates of locoregional recurrence compared to PBI. These outcomes, consistent with other series and current guidelines, suggest a limited role for low-energy IORT as monotherapy.

Intraoperative Radiation Therapy as a Safe Alternative to Whole Breast Radiation for Treatment of Minimally Invasive Breast Cancers: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) in select populations is a viable alternative to whole breast radiation therapy (WBRT) in the treatment of biopsy-proven localized invasive and non-invasive breast cancer. We aim to assess recurrence and complication rates following IORT in lumpectomy patients at a community hospital in Baltimore City. METHODS: An IRB-approved retrospective cohort study was conducted on consecutive cases of lumpectomy with IORT from 2013 through 2020 by a single surgeon. Patient demographics, tumor and operative characteristics, and complications were retrieved from electronic medical records. Primary outcomes were postoperative complications and local recurrence rates. RESULTS: The final cohort included 117 patients with mean follow-up time of 2.60 + 1.78 years. Mean age was 69.84 + 8.77 years. Thirty-three (28.21%) of patients developed a seroma. Odds of seroma formation were mildly significant for skin spacing [OR: 1.18, 95% CI: (1.02-1.37)] and balloon fill volume [1.04 (1.00-1.08)], but not for age, BMI, diabetes, former or current smoking status, history of WBRT, tumor size, or balloon size. Three (2.6%) patients had local recurrence. Odds of local recurrence were mildly significant for increased tumor size [1.14 (1.04-1.24)] and not significant for any other covariates. CONCLUSIONS: IORT exposure did not confer higher rates of complications and the local recurrence rate mirrored that of the general population undergoing lumpectomy and WBRT. This study demonstrates the need for equitable treatment options based on individual needs: IORT is a safe alternative to WBRT in certain subpopulations, especially those with physical, social, or personal limitations preventing participation in a 3- to 7-week time commitment of WBRT.

Frozen Section Timeout: Pilot Study to Reconcile Margins Using 3D Resected Specimen and Defect Scans.

OBJECTIVE: Opportunities exist to improve intraoperative communication and documentation of resection margin details. We instituted a "frozen section timeout" that centers around visualization of the paired resection specimen and surgical defect-facilitating effective, bidirectional exchange of information. METHODS: We designed an interactive form for use during the "frozen section timeout" including annotated 3D virtual models of the resected specimen and surgical defect, plus a "line-item" table for primary and supplemental margin results. The "timeout" was conducted over a Zoom call between the operating room and frozen section laboratory. The form was simultaneously projected and discussed while all members of the surgical care team stopped activities. Nurses, co-surgeons, and all other members of the surgical team were encouraged to take part in this process. RESULTS: Twenty-six frozen section timeouts were conducted during head and neck surgeries in the Department of Otolaryngology at Mount Sinai West Hospital. These timeouts were facilitated by the lead surgeon, and all other activities were halted to ensure that critical information was shared, documented, and agreed upon. During the timeout, the annotated specimen and defect scans were displayed, clearly demonstrating the at-risk margins and the corresponding location and breadth of supplemental margins harvested. CONCLUSION: Incorporating a frozen section timeout can improve intraoperative communication, increase transparency, and potentially eliminate uncertainty regarding margin status and tumor clearance. Visualization of at-risk margins and the corresponding location and breadth of supplemental margins promises an unprecedented level of documentation and understanding. This novel technique can establish a new and improved standard of care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA Laryngoscope, 134:725-731, 2024.

Reducing re-excision rates in breast conserving surgery with Margin Probe: systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Different intraoperative techniques with varying levels of evidence are available to decrease positive surgical margins during breast conserving surgery. The aim of this review is to assess the effectiveness of the MarginProbe® device as an intraoperative adjunct tool in reducing positive surgical margins, and subsequently exploring the effect on patient re-excision rates. METHODOLOGY: A systematic review of the available medical literature was conducted from 2007 to March 2022. A literature search of Cochrane, PubMed and Embase by two independent reviewers reviwers was performed to identify eligible articles looking at the primary outcome of percentage reduction in patient re-excision rates using MarginProbe®. Secondary outcomes analysed were comparison of tissue volume removed, absolute and relative reduction in re-excision rate, cosmetic outcome, as well as MarginProbe® sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: A total of 12 full text articles were identified. An independent samples t-test using a total of 2680 patients found a 54.68 per cent reduction in re-excision rate with the use of MarginProbe®, which was statistically significant with a large effect size (P < 0.001; d = 1.826). Secondary outcomes showed a relatively higher sensitivity of the MarginProbe® device, at the expense of decreased specificity, and no significant impact on cosmesis and volume of breast tissue excised. CONCLUSION: MarginProbe® is an effective intraoperative adjunct in breast-conservation surgery that reduces patient re-excision rates, with no adverse effects relating to breast cosmesis or increase in volume of excised tissue.

Intraoperative Ultrasound for Extracting Deep-Seated Radio-Opaque Foreign Body from Calf: A Case Report.

CASE: A 50-year-old man presented with chronic refractory symptoms of radiating leg pain with muscle cramps because of a retained bullet in the calf after being shot in 1990. Radiographs confirmed the bullet lodged in posterolateral aspect of calf abutting proximal fibula. An intraoperative point-of-care ultrasound aided in accurate localization of bullet, thereby facilitating precise planning of surgical incision and subsequent removal. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound can be used as an alternative tool for safe surgical extraction of deep-seated metallic object with minimal tissue dissection, obviating the need for C-arm.

Intraoperative Blood Management Strategies for Patients Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery: The Ottawa Intraoperative Transfusion Consensus.

Importance: There is marked variability in red blood cell (RBC) transfusion during the intraoperative period. The development and implementation of existing clinical practice guidelines have been ineffective in reducing this variability. Objective: To develop an internationally endorsed consensus statement about intraoperative transfusion in major noncardiac surgery. Evidence Review: A Delphi consensus survey technique with an anonymous 3-round iterative rating and feedback process was used. An expert panel of surgeons, anesthesiologists, and transfusion medicine specialists was recruited internationally. Statements were informed by extensive preparatory work, including a systematic reviews of intraoperative RBC guidelines and clinical trials, an interview study with patients to explore their perspectives about intraoperative transfusion, and interviews with physicians to understand the various behaviors that influence intraoperative transfusion decision-making. Thirty-eight statements were developed addressing (1) decision-making (interprofessional communication, clinical factors, procedural considerations, and audits), (2) restrictive transfusion strategies, (3) patient-centred considerations, and (4) research considerations (equipoise, outcomes, and protocol suspension). Panelists were asked to score statements on a 7-point Likert scale. Consensus was established with at least 75% agreement. Findings: The 34-member expert panel (14 of 33 women [42%]) included 16 anesthesiologists, 11 surgeons, and 7 transfusion specialists; panelists had a median of 16 years' experience (range, 2-50 years), mainly in Canada (52% [17 of 33]), the US (27% [9 of 33]), and Europe (15% [5 of 33]). The panel recommended routine preoperative and intraoperative discussion between surgeons and anesthesiologists about intraoperative RBC transfusion as well as postoperative review of intraoperative transfusion events. Point-of-care hemoglobin testing devices were recommended for transfusion guidance, alongside an algorithmic transfusion protocol with a restrictive hemoglobin trigger; however, more research is needed to evaluate the use of restrictive triggers in the operating room. Expert consensus recommended a detailed preoperative consent discussion with patients of the risks and benefits of both anemia and RBC transfusion and routine disclosure of intraoperative transfusion. Postoperative morbidity and mortality were recommended as the most relevant outcomes associated with intraoperative RBC transfusion, and transfusion triggers of 70 and 90 g/L were considered acceptable hemoglobin triggers to evaluate restrictive and liberal transfusion strategies, respectively, in clinical trials. Conclusions and Relevance: This consensus statement offers internationally endorsed expert guidance across several key domains on intraoperative RBC transfusion practice for noncardiac surgical procedures for which patients are at medium or high risk of bleeding. Future work should emphasize knowledge translation strategies to integrate these recommendations into routine clinical practice and transfusion research activities.